Partiality keller simon. Partiality, by Simon Keller. 2019-03-12

Partiality keller simon Rating: 4,1/10 207 reviews

Partiality, by Simon Keller.

partiality keller simon

You make sacrifices for your friends that you do not make for other people, but your friends do not matter more than other people. Indeed, we would find fault with a father who did not show a certain degree of partiality for his own child. Keller first presents two main accounts of partiality: the projects view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the place that people take within our lives and our commitments, and the relationships view, on which relationships themselves contain fundamental value or reason-giving force. Contents: Special relationships and special reasons -- My projects -- Our relationship -- Your value -- My response to your value. Prices do not include postage and handling if applicable.

Next

Partiality by Simon Keller by Simon Keller

partiality keller simon

Partiality is a work in moral philosophy, and page 99 finds me engaged in an activity of which philosophers are perhaps a little too fond: drawing distinctions. Our moral lives are shaped by a deep commitment to the moral equality of all persons. Keller develops a novel account of these reasons, nested in an elegant taxonomy of rival perspectives and illustrated by a series of terrific examples that effectively distill the distinctive arguments under consideration. Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Simon Keller is associate professor of philosophy at Victoria University, Wellington. On this way of talking, all reasons are good reasons; a bad reason is no reason at all.

Next

Simon Keller, Partiality

partiality keller simon

Cite this article as: Derpmann, S. If you did not treat your own friends and family differently from how you treat strangers, then there would be something wrong with you. You, with your mother, and I, with my son, each have reasons that emerge from special relationships. Learn at the Princeton University Press website. You may also favor your own country over other countries, your own team over other teams, or your alma mater over other schools.

Next

Partiality ISBN 9780691154732 PDF epub

partiality keller simon

He defends this view by saying that we must accept that two people, whether friend or stranger, can have the same value, even as their value makes different demands upon people with whom they share different relationships. On the one side, it could be said that the perspective from which the puzzle arises—a perspective that takes impartiality as the natural starting point—is simply mistaken, even if seductive; perhaps the perspective of morality is not an impartial perspective after all. A reason to act, that is to say, is a consideration that really counts in favor of the act, not one that merely seems to count in its favor, or that someone merely thinks to count in its favor. Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. There is a natural, compelling picture of morality into which norms of partiality do not appear to fit. Summary We are partial to people with whom we share special relationships--if someone is your child, parent, or friend, you wouldn't treat them as you would a stranger. Instead, Keller defends the individuals view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the value of the individuals with whom our relationships are shared.

Next

Partiality ISBN 9780691154732 PDF epub

partiality keller simon

Sometimes, a special relationship changes your normative situation by giving you reasons to perform some acts rather than others. The relationships account is defended Journal Ethical Theory and Moral Practice — Springer Journals Published: Apr 1, 2014. Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. He is the author of The Limits of Loyalty. What, for example, is your reason for treating your friends differently from other people, or your children differently from other children? Now, how would you respond? If I am right, then to understand the morality of partiality — and in particular the experience of acting out of special concern for another person — we need to focus on a good old Enlightenment value: the value of individual persons, as persons. Instead of furthering the much debated question to what extent partiality poses a problem for impartialism in moral philosophy or vice versa, Keller attempts to provide an account of partiality in its own right.

Next

Simon Keller, “Partiality” (Princeton UP, 2013)

partiality keller simon

It comes rather from their importance as particular distinct individuals, considered in their own rights. Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Our reasons can be different from our motives. Simon Keller explains that in order to understand why we give special treatment to our family and friends, we need to understand how people come to matter in their own rights. Those we treat differently from everyone else, within our special relationships, are not more important than everyone else. We are willing to sacrifice and be sacrificed for these people. We place many of them — close friends, children, spouses — at the centre of our lives, both moral and otherwise.

Next

Partiality by Simon Keller · OverDrive (Rakuten OverDrive): eBooks, audiobooks and videos for libraries

partiality keller simon

This case might be explained as one in which your special relationship takes away a reason that would otherwise be there. We do not do special things for our friends and family members just because we feel like it. In other cases, a special relationship may make a difference to your normative situation without generating reasons. It makes a difference that these people are your parents. The book is about the normative significance of special relationships, and that normative significance is not or not obviously all about reasons.

Next

Keller, S.: Partiality (Hardcover and Ebook)

partiality keller simon

Your reasons to give special treatment in such cases do not raise any questions about partiality in particular. Also, it may be that the class of reasons of partiality is not unified. Your reason is not simply that you care about them, and not simply that they are your parents. Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Partiality presents a theory of the reasons supporting special treatment within special relationships and explores the vexing problem of how we might reconcile the moral value of these relationships with competing claims of impartial morality. Instead, Keller defends the individuals view, on which reasons of partiality arise from the value of the individuals with whom our relationships are shared. Keller considers three accounts of the philosophical foundation of partiality: justifications referring to personal projects, to relationships, and to the individuals towards whom we are partial.

Next